Tuesday, February 12

Journal #7: Misconception of Evolution?



Searching for a comedy film, I was browsing through a list in IMDB when I came across the title Dumb and Dumberer. Intrigued, I proceeded to clink on the link to learn a bit about the plot before choosing to watch it. During that, its promotional picture has shown up, and it looks like this.




This model of “evolution”, used in an entertainment context and though it is a comical and effective advertisement, it does little to set straight many people’s misconceptions on evolution. Heck, if I were not studying Biology, I probably would have thought this was a correct portrayal of evolution, as well.

From this promotional picture, I inferred that the two main characters, Harry and Lloyd, are so incredibly dim-witted that the “simple” apes themselves are more advanced than they are. Moreover, this picture also suggest the evolutionary representation most people thought it true: as time goes on, the species (usually on the left, and looking minimal) gradually becomes more complex and into a whole different species altogether. The classic example being the apes—there is an idea in which we, as humans, came from monkeys or apes or something to that variety. I, along with most people I know, thought it true for a while. However, now, with some knowledge in this matter, I can state confidently that this notion is incorrect. Apes and humans share a common ancestor, but diverged into different species before some traits; thus, our appearances are both similar and differentiating. We are not transformed apes. Also, if the evolutionary history is made into a visual representation, it should be this:
Evolutionary history!



—where the evolutionary relationships with other organisms, and the divergence, are shown. Once again, oh, the things you learn in biology.

No comments:

Post a Comment